Click here for more information


Open Adoption Blog

06/04/07

What Can Happen When Some Women Don’t Consider Adoption

Posted by : Deb Donatti in Open Adoption Blog at 04:11 pm , 835 words, 123 views  
Categories: Adoption Frustration, Society's View


Thursday I drove 100 miles round trip to pick up two girls ages 12 and 14, to stay for the summer. Sounds like a fun visit, and it will be to some extent, but there are also some more complicated layers to this story that has been going back and forth for far to many years.

These are the youngest two girls of former high school friend. A mother of four, haphazardly parented children. In my opinion she might qualify as one of the many mothers who probably should have placed these children for adoption years ago. Instead she followed “her right” to parent down to the very last straw, leaving her children with a mix of issues, suffering, and an uncertain future. She had been hot lined tons of times before, and moved between several states over the years to avoid detection. After the last abusive boyfriend molested one of the children, they finally were removed. The two girls are now living with the biological father of one of them, and the current situation still leaves much to be desired. After a few weeks here in relative calm and care they go back into that great unknown to finish out their formative years. A grim prospect, but the only one that has been afforded them.

SPONSOR

When the girls were small my husband and I took them home on every occasion we were asked, which was quite a bit. In fact the oldest girl we practically raised for the first three years of her life. Every time the girls came to us they needed clothing, shoes, were dirty, hungry, coved in head lice and scabies, and anything else you could imagine. The mother had a never ending parade of abusive men, some of whom we will never know the full extent of what they did to the children, others, well unfortunately we do know and it wasn’t good. We offered countless times to take the children in permanently, be it fostering, guardianship, or adoption, and were always met with anger and righteous indignation from this mother. Other people around her were telling her how awful we were to even suggest it, and how she should not ever consider such a move. It was her “choice” to bounce them around in a state of abuse and neglect for most of their young lives. She is their mother so it was her right. Still to this day though, I feel the full force of my anger about that, because never were the rights of these children put first.

Through it all my husband and I were there when needed to offer a safe place for the kids. We apparently still are. Currently the girls live with the biological father of one of them. While at first I was glad that he has stepped forward to accept the girls when their mother lost custody, he has a ton to learn about caring for them and addressing the negative things they have already experienced. Unfortunately he is not really doing the best of jobs, as he is away from home for weeks on end with his work, leaving them in the care of the girlfriend dejour (there have already been a few). Somehow the situation seems not so different from the one they were already removed from in some ways. And so in 4- 6 years these girls will be set out into the world on their own, raised, adults, with only the benefit (if you could call it that) of the chaotic, abusive upbringing they had. This all in the sacred name of protecting biological parental rights.

When I think of how very different the lives of these girls might have been if their mother might have at least considered our offer (in any form, and always with her complete involvement), the difference is dramatic. These children who moved from many states, often never even having a bed to sleep in, being abused by many, often lacking in care and basic needs, would have instead had one home, one set of guardians, the same school, proper consistent care, attention and stability. As this is just putting things in the most basic definition.

So I suppose when some would gush on and on about remaining with biological parents always being the best situation for every child, I have some harsh experience that has shown me otherwise. I have come to understand, through the frustration of this situation, that all too often many would discount the long term needs of the child in order to preserve the rights of a biological parent to possess that child. And some would say that adoption should never be offered as an option to any expectant mother, ever? To me these are people who have never experienced the heartbreakingly ruined young lives that can result, when a mother who can’t or won’t parent is never even encouraged to consider the concept of choosing something different .

Sadness and Joy, Loss and Gain


The Responsibility Of Choices

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: erin_d_a [Member] Email
I will say again, the women who place are not the women who end up with kids in this position. The wrong women are placing for adoption.

It is pretty commonly assumed that the kids who are in foster care are kids whose moms changed their minds, or chose to parent. The fact is most of these kids parents never even considered adoption.

These are two very seperate issues and it is wrong to combine them.
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 16:50
Comment from: erin_d_a [Member] Email
Oh and every study ever done shows even if she had been presented adoption she wouldn't have chosen it. It isn't a matter of presenting her the facts, it is a matter of she wouldn't have considered adoption for her children.

I grew up in a home where I should have been placed, I would say many of those in my family should have been placed. None of their parents even considered it. Not that they didn't know it was an option, they just didn't consider it.

I don't think anybody in the reform crowd says that staying with the biological parents is always the best option. In fact most of us recognize that adoption is often the only solution and sometimes a much better solution than being with their biological families. But once again it comes back to the fact that most of the women who place wouldn't have let their children get to this place.
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 16:51
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Plenty of people in the "reform crowd" do feel that staying with the biological parents is always the best option. Visit Adoption Crossroads, Origins and C.U.B. to name just a few.
By the way I support adoption reforms.
Legal enforcable open adoption (if all parties desire it)
Open records
Uniform laws
Fair revocation times
Unbiased Counseling
Elimination of excessive fees
just to name a few.
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 18:03
Comment from: erin_d_a [Member] Email
I am familiar with all those sites. All of them are advocates for family preservation AND recognize that sometimes adoption or long term placement is the only and best option. None of them say that children should remain with their biological parents if the situation is unsafe. There is a small faction of people that are anti-adoption in all circumstances, it is a very small number of people though.
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 18:08
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Erin, I would love to talk with you more about our differing views on the ethics issue. I am curious how you decided that the mother whose child you adopted was making the best decison in her situation. How were you comfortable accepting her child? Would she not have been able to parent with out help and support? Feel free to email me privately.
Thanks
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 18:24
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
Erin, it's good to know the anti-adoption crowd is a small fraction of the total population.

I'm not surprised you support the reforms you mentioned, Deb. I think your concern for ethical placement shines through in your blogging. I support those reforms you mentioned, as well. Particularly the unbiased counseling. If unbiased counseling is an aspect of every adoption, then every expectant mom has a chance to make an informed choice on the pros and cons of parenting vs placing for adoption. This is essential, IMO, for an ethical adoption to take place.

There are, unfortunately, a group of people who wear the cloak of adoption reform whose ideas are closer to anti-adoption. There are also people who would rather reform DIDN'T happen because it is too "inconvenient" for them. These are the extremes that, IMO, we need to avoid.

Great post, as usual, Deb! :)

PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 19:13
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
soblessed,
I agree about the extremes. Thanks for your comment!
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 19:17
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthfamily-search.adoptionblogs.com/
Deb,

I am on the CUB Board, and most CUB members are only against unnecessary adoptions, not all adoption. No one I know condones children remaining in unsafe or dangerous homes.

The theory is NOT family preservation at all costs. Origins, as far as I can tell, IS anti-adoption. Even anti-adoption people do not advocate children staying in unsafe families - show me anywhere that recommends that.

PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 19:41
Comment from: erin_d_a [Member] Email
"Regardless of disagreements between individuals, I think that adoption reform is receiving strong support because we realize the need for safe, ethical placements for the well-being of all concerned, most especially the child whose future is being decided without their vote....."

we can agree on this :-)

PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 20:18
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
I DO understand that unnecessary relinquishments take place. Parental/family pressure; agencies that can be biased in their presentation of all options; too short revocation periods, etc are all occuring and occuring far too often in adoption (not that even once is acceptable, of course). Reform is needed, not just to make sure relinquishments are ethical, but also to get the word out that there are resources for those expectant parents who choose to parent their child. Ignorance of resources could arguably be considered forcing an adoption plan when one was not intended.

Having said that, however, I do think there is a difference between an unethical relinquishment and regret for placing on the part of birthparent(s) later on. Second guessing, or even regretting, a major life decision does not mean that the original decision was wrong. I think sometimes those two things get linked together when there isn't necessarily a direct correlation.

Regardless of disagreements between individuals, I think that adoption reform is receiving strong support because we realize the need for safe, ethical placements for the well-being of all concerned, most especially the child whose future is being decided without their vote.....
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 20:33
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Having said that, however, I do think there is a difference between an unethical relinquishment and regret for placing on the part of birthparent(s) later on. Second guessing, or even regretting, a major life decision does not mean that the original decision was wrong. I think sometimes those two things get linked together when there isn't necessarily a direct correlation.

soblessed, I agree sometimes regrets after an adoption are confused in the minds of many as some lack of ethics originally.
Great comment
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 20:38
Comment from: John [Member] Email
It is hard to truly understand the damage a really bad set of parents can do until you have parented very damaged kids. Erin, I do think you are probably right, these parents aren't about to put the child first - they never have. I would argue, based on raising kids who have been abused, that the system needs to operate faster, not slower.

Adoption needs to be seen as a good thing, in situations where the biological parents musn't or won't parent. Trying to pitch adoption as the equivilent of being cast into hell leaves kids stuck in very dangerous and damaging situations.

Outstanding post Deb. John
PermalinkPermalink 06/04/07 @ 20:49
Comment from: Heather [Member] Email
Deb and soblessed - I agree with you on the lines blurred between ethics/coersion and regret. While there are many true situations of coersion, sometimes I think there are some situations that get stamped with "coersion" that appear to be a bit of s stretch.
PermalinkPermalink 06/05/07 @ 07:26
Comment from: Nicole [Member] Email
What is this aversion to the idea that coercion is prevalent in infant adoption?

You know, I just attended a mental health conference this week (for work), and it's interesting... "coercion" is a word that comes up a LOT in those circles, too. Yet the attitudes in accepting the existence of "coercion" are very different. Every single MH professional I've met admits there are coercive practices in mental health, and that we need to stamp them out. In adoption, not only do the adoption professinals deny it, but they've got their CLIENTS (adoptive parents, and heck even a bunch of birth parents) denying coercive practices, too.

How come MH professionals can admit THEY THEMSELVES do coercive practices regularly, yet adoptive parents can't admit adoption professionals (not themselves) do them regularly?

PermalinkPermalink 06/06/07 @ 23:22
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Adopt Help Adopt Help Adopt Help

Misc

Subscribe to Open Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 180