Click Here to be helped in California!


Pregnant? Click Here
Open Adoption Blog

02/17/07

Parenting And Accountability

Posted by : Deb Donatti in Open Adoption Blog at 02:28 pm , 754 words, 100 views  
Categories: Rants and Ravings, In The News


Recently there has been a some what controversial study about adoptive parents offering more to their kids, and there by being somehow better parents. This has been quickly followed by a lot of theories about who is better, and what makes them so much more qualified. Some have even brought infertility and self esteem into the already complicated mix as well as questioning what is it exactly that separates birth and adoptive parents in ability.

Personally I cannot speak to everyone’s experience I can however address it from my own perspective. This weighing in by me does not mean I have every answer, this is just my own process of wondering what the heck is going on and sharing it with you reading. Feel free to agree or disagree, after all your unique experience might make other things more apparent to you.

SPONSOR

As for that study, I do not believe that as an adoptive parent I am doing any better a job than a biological parent might. The difference however, is that I have had to completely and in depth prove my ability to do that parenting before being grated permission to do so. I do not see that as a bad thing. Children transitioning from one home to another need to be assured that this is a secure place they are going to. For the most part the process is a necessary one.

My question is why does society not feel the need to hold ALL parents equally accountable before hand, not simply adoptive ones? Being a biological parent does not automatically assure that you will be a quality parent. Why do some people believe that we should be encouraging biological parents to parent no matter what? Even after children have been harmed and removed from their biological parents this belief persists and those parents are given every chance to regain a child they may not be fit to parent. Perhaps we should be asking biological parents to provide some evidence that they are going to go into the heavy task of parenting well educated and informed as adoptive parents are already required to do. If that were the case I feel like there would be fewer instances where society needed to clean up a mess made and remove children from homes. To me it seems a bit nuts. For adoptive parents we have them pre-qualify their ability, for biological parents we only come in after the fact, and after an actual child is harmed. In one case we are thinking ahead to protect the interest of a child who cannot do so for themselves, in the other we are allowing what will happen to happen unrestricted till something goes wrong. Bizarre.

I feel being a biological parent in society comes with a greater sense of entitlement than people will admit. I am however someone that feels if we are a careful enough society to licence someone to drive a car, how about providing some training and accountability for everyone who will be responsible for a human life? Did I as an adoptive parent feel somehow entitled to parent? Well after I had opened up every part of my life for scrutiny, submitted to many tests and jumped through several thousand hoops to prove that I could handle the possibility, I guess I at least felt prepared. I felt I had shown others I was prepared. That did not mean I felt entitled to have a child, but it did mean that I had provided information to show that if I was blessed enough to receive the opportunity to parent, I was ready. Why does that make me bad? I do not believe it does. I wanted to be a parent, I did what was necessary to show that I was ready and capable before ever welcoming a child. I think it’s ok for me to feel confident.

Now that I have been blessed with children to parent, I admit I am no perfect parent. I am just about the same as other parents who are working hard every day to do what they feel is best for their children. By the process that came before, the preparation, the accountability, I feel I better understand what to do as well as when I need help and how to go about looking for it. I think every child whether they remain in their biological family or are joined with a forever home through adoption is entitled to that much accountability from society.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Faith Allen [Member] Email · http://hoping.adoptionblogs.com/
Amen!! EXCELLENT post!! I completely agree with everything you said.

I think the difference in comparing adoptive homes to bio homes is that all adoptive families CHOSE to become parents and underwent an intensive "screening and training" process through a home study. The bio sample includes people from all walks of life, some of whom never received any sort of parenting education and some of whom never wanted children to begin with.

I agree with this quote from that article:

"It's an affirmation that there are all sorts of families that are good for kids," he said. "Adoptive parents aren't less good or better. They just bring different benefits to the table. In terms of how families are formed, it should be a level playing field."


I wish that all parents could receive a home study. There are so many children growing up in abusive households. I wish that abusive parents could be screened before being able to parent a child.

Take care,

- Faith
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 14:47
Comment from: cinnamon [Member] Email
Hello Faith, As I read this I found myself with an internal hmmmmmmm surfacing. Screening and training is not an assurance that a child is getting good parents or that the parents will be good at parenting. From experience: I went guarantor as to the character of friends when they were in the process of screening when adopting a little girl. What was not revealed or even evident to me or the screener was that they were having severe problems and a few years after the adoption they were divorced. The husband who was a teacher ended up being sacked for sexual misconduct with a student. The face that is show to the world is not necessarily the real face that is there when the world is not looking. Ever heard of the saying "Different faces for different places."
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 18:36
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Considering abusive families make it through a home study, I don't have much faith in the system at all. I just simply don't, especially understanding that people with abusive personalities are also often master-manipulators and can talk their way around a social worker with great ease.

If there were no documented cases of adoptive parents abusing their children, I would agree with you and Faith that this is a higher level of accountability. But those that WANT to lie, WILL lie, whether they're biological, adoptive or otherwise labeled.
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 19:01
Comment from: Heather [Member] Email
I agree that the screening system is not perfect, however I would be interested in stats (comparing abuse in adoptive families vs bio families). Jenna is correct, if you want to lie, you can lie. Although those with a (convicted) past will have a difficult time getting past background checks.

One thing that I keep seeing over and over is this whole concept of entitlement. I have yet to meet an entitled adoptive parent...I think that some like to throw that term around.
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 19:14
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthfamily-search.adoptionblogs.com/
Like Jenna, I do not have a great deal of faith that screening and home studies are that reliable as a parenting test.

I think it is unrealistic to expect that every biological parent need to be tested or screened before being allowed to parent or anything along those lines. However, I do believe that we need to offer more parenting and life education classes in the public school system. There is not enough emphasis on real life skills. Math, art and history are good to know, but I think we ignore teaching our children life skills, including parenting.

Our society is not doing too great a job of following up on parents who do not do a good job - adoptive or birth. Both need accountability. It is hard to predict though who will succeed and who will not.
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 19:45
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
"Considering abusive families make it through a home study, I don't have much faith in the system at all."

So because we miss a few we should just chuck the whole idea and continue to check no one(except for those adopting of course)?
I think that goes back to the idea in our society that you have a right to concieve and bear children no questions asked.
Entitlement?
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 20:00
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Jan, maybe we should skip every other potential adoptive parent in the screening process as well. I mean its just so much work for everyone, is it realistic?
PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 20:03
Comment from: Jan Baker [Member] Email · http://birthfamily-search.adoptionblogs.com/
Deb, I think you are going to have a hard time selling the idea that people need to be screened before giving birth. I know some adoptive parents feel as though it is only fair, but...

Call it entitlement or whatever, but yes, our society does not have a one child restriction or make attempts to limit children born into a family. Most Americans believe that the government has no right to decide who is "entitled" to give birth or not.

This is one of those apple and orange comparisions - doesn't work.

There are some things that we need to do whether they are realistic or not - I put screening adoptive parents into that category.

PermalinkPermalink 02/17/07 @ 21:54
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
I put screening ALL potential parents in that catagory.
If parents are parents then the need to make sure those parents are safe and capable for the sake of the potential children IS a priority.
Like I said, we can do it before a child enters the picture, or continue to clean up the mess after a child is hurt as we currently do all to protect that sense of entitlement that you need.
PermalinkPermalink 02/18/07 @ 06:39
Comment from: Opalwench [Member] Email · http://www.abarrelofnelsons.com/blog/
I'm going to agree with Jenna and Jan on this one. Because I don't support the government or some other sort of administrative body stepping in and making broad stroke decisions about how citizens live their lives. It's the same reason that I believe the government needs to butt out of the issue of same sex marriage.

I fully support the idea of more education on parenting, of more preventative work to stop child abuse. But I cannot support the idea of "screening." Because that's when anyone who doesn't quite fit society's definition of normal is going to lose out. Where can the standards come from? What is the perfect age to parent? (There are some very good teen parents out there.) How about the perfect size yard to parent? The perfect set of community activities? How long would it be under some of (our current socio-economical-political climate) before the rules become extremely twisted? Before you have to be a certain religion or have certain color hair? I know that's extreme but that's where I see this going.
PermalinkPermalink 02/18/07 @ 10:02
Comment from: cinnamon [Member] Email

Deb you said
>>>>I think that goes back to the idea in our society that you have a right to concieve and bear children no questions asked.
Entitlement?
PermalinkPermalink 02/18/07 @ 13:15
Comment from: cinnamon [Member] Email
Deb
>>>I put screening ALL potential parents in that catagory.
PermalinkPermalink 02/18/07 @ 13:21
Comment from: cinnamon [Member] Email
OOps.
Deb
Entitlement you said - Since when did Society have a say in conception is that not Nature or God (for those who believe)that have the dibs on that?
You then said: I put screening ALL potential parents in that catagory.I can feel reactivity in you comments.
Are you really sure you would want to live in a Society that took such freedoms away - do you realise that would be Communism/Socialism or bordering on it. Think more deeply and wider about the implications of your ideas.
PermalinkPermalink 02/18/07 @ 13:30
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
I know you're taking this personally, Deb, but it's not about YOU. Yes, you're a great parent. Yes, others are great parents. But I see far too many flaws in the system to impose it on the entire world. Do I think the way that the system currently stands is fair to adoptive parents? Nope.

Entitlement? You know me better than that. You're getting riled up for personal reasons of which my comment held no attack against you OR adoptive parents as a whole. No one accused you of abuse. No one would. Just because I don't agree with your idea doesn't mean you need to insult me.

Opal brings up great points about the differences in socio-economic ideals. Then there's me. I'm a pierced and tattooed Mamma. Would I be exclused because I don't parent in a traditional manner? There are some schools of thought that place co-sleeping in the child abuse category. Once the rules are out for what is and is not acceptable parenting, couples wanting to be families will condition their answers to what the social workers want to hear. "Yes, our child will go to private school and have expensive bedding."


PermalinkPermalink 02/18/07 @ 15:21
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
People follow reasonable rules to exisit in our society every day.
The process never offended me, I wonder why it would anyone else.
I just believe all children deserve the benefit of coming into a safe place. If the least that this means is a abuse and neglect screening and police check is done on new parents, I think it would be a positive thing. It may go a long way to help some children. Why anyone would be so quickly opposed simply confuses me.
Jenna sorry you felt I insulted you, not the case, I simply don't agree.
PermalinkPermalink 02/18/07 @ 20:31
Comment from: Faith Allen [Member] Email · http://hoping.adoptionblogs.com/
I just popped back over here and saw that this had turned into a big discussion. My support about screening all parents has nothing to do with concerns about a birthparent's ability to parent. It has to do with my experience in growing up in an abusive household (with my bio parents, who were married and appeared to be a very "normal" middle class household) and knowing MANY people who endured similar traumas. I only wish that my parents had been screened so that I could have been spared all that I endured.

According to U.S. statistics, 1 in 3 to 4 girls and 1 in 6 to 7 boys are sexually abused by age 18. A majority of the abuse takes place in the home -- not just by parents but by extended family as well. That is not even getting into those who are emotionally and physically abused. While there are some abusers who slip through the cracks in adoption, the stats are not anywhere near this high. I believe this is, in part, due to the screening process.

This is a soapbox issue for me, so I could go on forever. I have LIVED the life of an abused child. I KNOW the devastation is causes on a child's life. I KNOW the enormous amount of work it takes to overcome the pain and learn how to trust again in adulthood.

Those stats are too high. In my opinion, child abuse is an epidemic in the U.S. as well as in other countries. SOMETHING needs to be done.

I know that screening every single family who gets pregnant is unrealistic. There is no way that it can be done logistically. However, I fully support the idea in theory because there are too many broken people in our society because they were born to people who had no business being parents.

- Faith
PermalinkPermalink 02/19/07 @ 04:41
Comment from: Opalwench [Member] Email · http://www.abarrelofnelsons.com/blog/
Deb, I respect your open and your right to it. I simply disagree. While you talk about people following reasonable rules, I'm not seeing this as a possible reasonable rule. It comes across as too punitive and exclusionary to me. The positives could be to easily subverted to meet an agenda without such noble goals. I believe that part of protecting children also involves protecting the rights of the adults that they will become. Yes, I do see positives if this plan worked in an ideal fashion, but we unfortunately do not live in a world of ideals.

Faith, I'm sorry for the abuse you experienced as a child, and yes, I agree that child abuse is an epidemic. I just don't believe that this is the proper cure.
PermalinkPermalink 02/19/07 @ 06:13
Comment from: Jenna Hatfield [Member] Email · http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/
Not an insult to accuse me of being/feeling entitlement? Okay, Deb.
PermalinkPermalink 02/19/07 @ 07:13
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Jenna, I spoke to our cultures belief that anyone has the right to concieve and bear a child no questions asked. I believe I used your quote to address, but not to single YOU out specifically as an example. That disparity would apply to me as well if I concieved. No one would ask me to provide edvidence in any way that I was prepared, as they did when I adopted. I would love to hear what those with both bio and adopted children would think as well. Just seems a double standard to me. I would not be afraid to go through the same things for a pregnancy myself, although I can see where some say that the sheer magnitude of doing it would be difficult if not impossible. That is very different from what some others are saying, that is is unneccesary. That is what squeaks of entitlement to me. Just my opinion.
My thought is if we are protecting a child who will be adopted by screening potential parents, then why the double standard? I, like Faith came from a biological background of abuse. How different might my life have been if someone one was looking out for MY interests in the way of checking my parents before hand?
Contrary to what has been said, I am NOT taking things personally(or gettin riled), but I do still feel as I do. Thats ok, and it's ok to disagree.

I would appreciate no further comments here after this because it is getting way to long. If anyone wants to talk further with me I would be happy to answer any emails you wish to send.
Thanks to everyone for their input! Hearing a variety of thoughts is not a bad thing at all.
PermalinkPermalink 02/19/07 @ 13:21
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
One more comment, please??????

The photo for this post is just TOO funny! I crack up every time I see it ...
PermalinkPermalink 02/20/07 @ 06:47
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Categories

Adopt Help Adopt Help Adopt Help

Misc

Subscribe to Open Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 139